After Aristotle had completed his great speculative system, philosophy
moves toward a new emphasis. Four groups of philosophers helped to shape this
new direction, namely, the Epicureans, the Stoics, the Skeptics, and the
Neoplatonist. They were, of course, greatly influenced by their predecessors,
so we find that Epicurus relied upon Democritus for his atomic theory of
nature, the Stoics made use of Heraclitus’ notion of a fiery substance
permeating all things, the Skeptics built a method of inquiry upon the Socratic
form of doubt, and Plotinus drew heavily upon Plato. What made their philosophy
different, however, was not so much its subject matter as its mood and its
emphasis. Its emphasis was practical, and its mood was self-centered.
Philosophy became more practical by emphasizing the art of living. To be sure,
each of these new movements of thought did involve speculative descriptions of
the structure of the universe. But instead of working out blueprints for the
ideal society and fitting individuals into large social and political
organizations, as Plato and Aristotle had done, these new philosophers led
people to think primarily of themselves and how they as individuals in a scheme
of nature could achieve the most satisfactory personal life.
These new directions in ethics were brought about to a great extent by
the historical conditions of the times. After the Peloponnesian War and with
the fall of Athens, Greek civilization declined. With the breakdown of the
small Greek city-state, individual citizens lost the sense of their own
importance and their ability to control or perfect their social and political
destiny. Individuals increasingly felt this loss of personal control over
collective life as they were absorbed into the growing Roman Empire. When
Greece became a mere province of Rome, men lost interest in pursing the
speculative questions concerning the ideal society. What was needed was a
practical philosophy to give life direction under changing conditions. And at a
time when events overwhelmed people, it seemed idle to try to change history.
But if history was beyond humanity’s control, at least a person’s own life
could be managed with some success. Philosophy, therefore, shifted to this
practical emphasis in a mood of increasing concern for the more immediate world
of the individual.
The Epicureans turned in the directions of an ideal for living through
what they called ataraxia, or tranquility of soul. The Stoics sought to control
their reactions to inevitable events, while the Skeptics sought to preserve
personal freedom by refraining from any basic commitment to ideals whose truth
was doubtful, and Plotinus promised salvation in a mystical union with god.
They looked to philosophy for a source of meaning for human existence, and it
is no wonder that their philosophy, particularly Stoicism, was later to compete
with religion for the allegiance of humanity. They sought to discover ways in
which individual persons could successfully achieve happiness or contentment in
a world that was not altogether friendly and filled with many pitfalls.
No comments:
Post a Comment