Introdcution
Jürgen Habermas (born 18 June 1929) is a German
sociologist and philosopher
in the tradition of critical theory and pragmatism. He is perhaps best known
for his theories on communicative rationality and the public sphere. In 2014,
Prospect readers chose Habermas as one of their favourites among the
"world's leading thinkers.’
Associated with the Frankfurt School, Habermas's work focuses on the
foundations of social theory and epistemology, the analysis of advanced
capitalistic societies and democracy, the rule of law in a critical
social-evolutionary context, and contemporary politics, particularly German
politics. Habermas's theoretical system is devoted to revealing the possibility
of reason, emancipation, and rational-critical communication latent in modern
institutions and in the human capacity to deliberate and pursue rational
interests. Habermas is known for his work on the concept of modernity, particularly
with respect to the discussions of rationalization originally set forth by Max
Weber. He has been influenced by American pragmatism, action theory, and even
poststructuralism.
Communication is a central concept in the philosophy of the German philosopher
Jürgen Habermas.
This term is also about misunderstandings because it is often associated
with the ordinary meaning. However, the concept of communication is the
opposite of the same concept used in the science of communication. It is not in
this case a strategic activity to present a project or aspects of reality in
one hand, by optimizing the admissibility of those who are the object and on
the other hand, to minimize or even hide the disadvantages or consequences. Habermas,
communication is contrary to the basic activity in which two or more subjects
are able to spontaneously get agreement on a draft joint action or a shared
reality in the public sphere.
Habermasian definition
of communication:
We can therefore define communication as strictly what happens between
two or more, talking seriously about something that exists or should exist in
the world, but no one disputes the validity of the statements or suggestions
made by and each other. Communication therefore uses a medium in and through which
it occurs: the language.
In this sense, communication is commonplace and everyday, but it is also
vital and is, indeed, a necessary condition for the symbolic reproduction of
the world, sharing information, learning process, etc.. We can therefore say
that it structures the world of everyday life.
Communication and
discussion:
It should not be confused, communication and discussion, even if the
contact points between the pragmatic of Apel and the philosophical Habermas
partly explain this assimilation.
The discussion in the German thinker, is not communication in the strict
sense, however, it is communicative in the sense that communication and
understanding are its purpose, it should be noted, however, that the
communication is interrupted by the disagreement and the conflict or dispute. There is no
solution of continuity between communication and discussion in the strict
sense, because the argumentative discourse that unfolds in the discussion is
latent in communication, it is present as a regulator underlying, but we do not
use it itself.
Thus, the validity claims are issued in the communication in the strict
sense.
No comments:
Post a Comment