By Rolf Bazuin
The
problem he was referring to is metaphysical in nature. In essence,
what he meant was that we have never seen objective reality for what
it truly is, rather, we only know our experience of what we think is
objective reality. There is really no way to tell how strong the
correlation is between what we perceive and what is perceived,
because we would have to bypass our own subjective experience, and
that's impossible as our subjective experience is the only way for us
to know the reality that surrounds us. So, what comes out of this, is
that what we typically refer to as objectively true, is in fact a
convention about truth.
Probably the best example of differentiating in
this manner is the fundamental axiom of psychology: the construction
of one's own reality. We know that the brain has a very limited
capacity to process data; for instance, the retina has about a 127
million optic receptors, yet the image sent through the optic nerve
is equivalent to about 1 million 'data units'. Also, the retina is
scanned about 15,000 times per second, yet only 24 frames per second
can fool our brain into believing that we are looking at a motion
picture. As can be seen, the nervous system has to discard about
99.999999% of visual data even before it gets to the primary visual
cortex. All this data will never even be presented to your brain.
From these facts alone, it must be argued that what we perceive must
have an extremely low correlation to what there actually is. All in
all, the chances of us overlooking some bigger picture are extremely
high.
So,
what this amounts to is that there are no facts, just
interpretations. Inside our head, we have all kinds of 'perfect'
Ideas in the form of logical concepts. But they are just that:
logical concepts. And as is argued above, proving these concepts to
be objectively true is completely impossible, due to the fact that it
is doubtful that we're experiencing objective reality for what it
truly is. Therefore, as far as mankind is concerned, we must accept
that what we think of as objective reality, is nothing more than our
interpretation of it - from our viewpoint, there are no facts, only
our interpretations of what we believe to be facts.
Ecclesiastes (esp.1:9) argued life is inherently meaningless except for God. Nietzsche made the clever observation that if it is inherently meaningless and Godless, it is neither good nor bad in itself, and so open to healthy interpretations!
ReplyDeleteI have a blog mostly dedicated to Nietzsche and Heidegger, and have a blog post addressing this issue about Nietzsche here: http://palpatinesway.blogspot.com/2019/07/the-heart-of-heideggers-nietzsche.html
Unfortunately, we see reality through languages, not beyond that. So, you are saying even with our natural eye is impossible. It seems that is our nature or our property as humans. Therefore, I agree to this impossibility of objective truth.
ReplyDelete