Widespread
in the Anglo-Saxon world, the analytical philosophy is not defined by
its objects, but by its method of reasoning.
Analytic Philosophy VS Continental Philosophy
Following
the new logic founded in the late nineteenth and the early twentieth
century by Frege
and
Russell,
and the philosophy of Wittgenstein,
the analytic philosophy is the dominant school of thought in the
Anglo-saxon world, opposed to the “continental philosophy”, a
term used to describe controversy both German idealism
like Heidegger, Deleuze
or Derrida.
What
is meant by “analytic philosophy”? Hence the question posed by
the title of the book by Hans-Johann Glock: What
is analytic philosophy?
It covers, in fact, very different thoughts and certainly does not
designate a specific philosophical doctrine, as analytic philosophers
have deep disagreements between them, not just this or that
particular issue, but even on the idea they have of philosophy. We
can not identify analytic philosophy to american or british
philosophy, since analytic philosophy has its roots in German authors
such as Frege,
and Austrian, as Wittgenstein.
Would the analytic philosophy be defined more by its
object? Despite their interest for some issues, such as the language
in such writers as Wittgenstein,
Austin,
Searle
and Quine,
analytic philosophers have, in fact, focused their discussion on
every area, (politics, morality or metaphysics …).
How
to characterize, under these conditions, analytic philosophy?
Probably by a “family resemblance” or a certain style, common to
different thinkers claiming this tradition whose main concern is
clarity, precision and rigor in the arguments.
No comments:
Post a Comment