Biopolitics is an intersectional field between biology and politics.
The term was coined by Rudolf Kjellén, who also coined the term geopolitics,
in his 1905 two-volume work The Great Powers. In contemporary US political
science studies, usage of the term is mostly divided between a
poststructuralist group using the meaning assigned by Michel Foucault (denoting
social and political power over life) and another group who uses it to denote
studies relating biology and political science.
Various definitions
In Kjellén's organicist view, the state was a quasi-biological organism,
a "super-individual creature". Kjellén sought to study "the
civil war between social groups" (comprising the state) from a biological
perspective and thus named his putative discipline "biopolitics"
The Nazis also used the term occasionally. For example, Hans Reiter used
it in a 1934 speech to refer to their biologically based concept of nation and
state and ultimately their racial policy.
Previous notions of the concept can actually be traced back to the
Middle ages in John of Salisbury's work Policraticus in which the coined term
Body politic is actually used. Modern usage of the term starts to gather pace
in the 19th century with Walter Bagehot's work Physics and politics in which he
reflects on the term as if he was a trained scientist in the form of Jakob von
Uexküll. Bagehot didn't have the scientifically trained mind such as von
Uexküll so he (Bagehot) falls rather short in the explanation of the term.
Nevertheless the book has some novel points particularly on the subject of
Natural selection and politics.
Morley Roberts in his 1938 book Bio-politics used to argue that a
correct model for world politics is "a loose association of cell and
protozoa colonies".
Robert E. Kuttner used the term to refer to his particular brand of
"scientific racism," as he called it, which he worked out with noted
Eustace Mullins, with whom Kuttner cofounded the Institute for Biopolitics in
the late 1950s, and also with Glayde Whitney, a behavioral geneticist. Most of
his adversaries designate his model as antisemitic. Kuttner and Mullins were
inspired by Morley Roberts, who was in turn inspired by Arthur Keith, or both
were inspired by each other and either co-wrote together (or with the Institute
of Biopolitics) Biopolitics of Organic Materialism dedicated to Roberts and
reprinted some of his works
In the work of Foucault, the style of government that regulates
populations through "biopower" (the application and impact of political
power on all aspects of human life).
In the works of Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri, anti-capitalist
insurrection using life and the body as weapons; examples include flight from
power and, 'in its most tragic and revolting form', suicide terrorism.
Conceptualised as the opposite of biopower, which is seen as the practice of
sovereignty in biopolitical conditions. The political application of bioethics.
A political spectrum that reflects positions towards the sociopolitical
consequences of the biotech revolution.
Political advocacy in support of, or in opposition to, some applications
of biotechnology
Public policies regarding some applications of biotechnology.
Political advocacy concerned with the welfare of all forms of life and
how they are moved by one another.
The politics of
bioregionalism.
The interplay and interdisciplinary studies relating biology and
political sciencprimarily the study of the relationship between biology and
political behavior most of these works agree on three fundamental aspects.
First, the object of investigation is primarily political behavior, which—and
this is the underlying assumption—is caused in a substantial way by objectively
demonstrable biological factors. For example, the relationship of biology and
political orientation, but also biological correlates of partisanship and
voting behavior
According to Professor Agni Vlavianos Arvanitis biopolitics is a
conceptual and operative framework for societal development, promoting bios
(Greek = life) as the central theme in every human endeavor, be it policy,
education, art, government, science or technology. This concept uses bios as a
term referring to all forms of life on our planet, including their genetic and
geographic variation.
Michel Foucault
French philosopher and social theorist Michel Foucault first discussed
his thoughts on biopolitics in his lecture series "Society Must Be
Defended" given at the Collège de France from 1975–1976.[20] Foucault's
concept of biopolitics is largely derived from his own notion of biopower, and
the extension of state power over both the physical and political bodies of a
population. While only mentioned briefly in his "Society Must Be
Defended" lectures, his concept of biopolitics has become prominent in
social and humanistic sciences.
Foucault described biopolitics as "a new technology of
power...[that] exists at a different level, on a different scale, and [that]
has a different bearing area, and makes use of very different
instruments." More than a disciplinary mechanism, Foucault's biopolitics
acts as a control apparatus exerted over a population as a whole or, as
Foucault stated, "a global mass."In the years that followed, Foucault
continued to develop his notions of the biopolitical in his "The Birth of
Biopolitics" and "The Courage of Truth" lectures.
Foucault gave numerous examples of biopolitical control when he first
mentioned the concept in 1976. These examples include "ratio of births to
deaths, the rate of reproduction, the fertility of a population, and so
on." He contrasted this method of social control with political power in
the Middle Ages. Whereas in the Middle Ages pandemics made death a permanent
and perpetual part of life, this was then shifted around the end of the 18th
century with the introduction of milieu into the biological sciences. Foucault
then gives different contrasts to the then physical sciences in which the
industrialisation of the population was coming to the fore through the concept
of work, where Foucault then argues power starts to become a target for this
milieu by the 17th century.With the development of vaccines and medicines
dealing with public hygiene allowed death to be held (and/or withheld) from
certain populations. This was the introduction of "more subtle, more
rational mechanisms: insurance, individual and collective savings, safety
measures, and so on.
No comments:
Post a Comment