Introduction
The Critique of Pure Reason (1781; second edition 1787) is a book by
Immanuel Kant that is considered one of the most influential works in the
history of philosophy. Also referred to as Kant's First Critique, it was
followed by the Critique of Practical Reason (1788) and the Critique of
Judgment (1790). In the preface to the first edition Kant explains what he
means by critique of pure reason, stating "I do not mean by this a
critique of books and systems, but of the faculty of reason in general, in
respect of all knowledge after which it may strive independently of all
experience."
The Critique is an investigation into the foundations and limits of
human knowledge, and the extent to which the human mind is able to engage in
metaphysics. Kant builds on the work of empiricist philosophers such as John
Locke and David Hume, as well as rationalists such as Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz
and Christian Wolff. He expounds new ideas on the nature of space and time, and
claims to provide solutions to Hume's scepticism regarding human knowledge of
the relation of cause and effect, and René Descartes' scepticism regarding
knowledge of the external world. Kant claims to enact a 'Copernican revolution'
in philosophy with his doctrine of transcendental idealism, according to which
our knowledge does not "conform to objects", but rather objects
"conform to our knowledge".According to Kant's doctrine, the human
mind shapes and structures the world of experience, making knowledge possible.
……………………………………………………………….
Summary of the
Critique of Pure Reason:
The Critique of Pure Reason, published by Immanuel Kant in 1781, is one
of the most complex structures and the most significant of modern philosophy,
bringing a revolution at least as great as that of Descartes and his Discourse
on Method.
The complexity of the first review (the second is the critique of
practical reason, and the third is a critique of the faculty of judging), is
such that Kant himself published an introductory text, entitled Prolegomena to
Any Future Metaphysics.
The aim of this book is summed up quite easily, however: metaphysics is
a battle that needs to be ordered. Kant proposes to everyone agreed, giving a
new status to reason and new contours to the understanding. In summary, the
critique of pure reason tries to define credible to the question: How do I
know? To this question Kant answers, I can think of the objects of metaphysics
(God, I, the world), but not knowing in the sense that I know the laws of
physics.
Analysis of the
Critique of Pure Reason Kant:
Kant makes two crucial distinction: between a priori and a posteriori
and between analytic and synthetic judgments.
A posteriori knowledge is knowledge gained from the experience and
knowledge a priori knowledge is necessary and universal, independent of
experience, such as our knowledge of mathematics.
In an analytical statement, the predicate is contained in the concept in
the subject, as, for example, in Judgement, “a bachelor is an unmarried man.”
In summary judgments, the predicate contains information not included in the
concept. Typically, one associates with the knowledge a posteriori synthetic
judgments a priori knowledge and analytical judgments. For example, the
decision “all swans are white” is synthetic because the whiteness is not a part
of the concept of “Swan” (a black swan is a swan yet), but it is also a
posteriori because we can not whether all swans are white.
Kant argues that math and science principles are synthetic a priori
knowledge. For example, the ruling “7 + 5 = 12” is a priori because it is a
necessary and universal truth, and it is synthetic, because the concept of “12”
is not contained in the concept of “7 + 5” .
Because man is capable of synthetic knowledge a priori, pure reason is
then able to know important truths. However, Kant is at odds with the
rationalist metaphysics poses the omnipotence of reason, capable of penetrating
the mysteries. On the contrary, Kant argues that it is about shaping the
reality around him. The subject is not only affected by the world, he is
actively involved in its creation. We shall return to this Copernican
revolution.
Time and space, according to Kant, are pure intuitions of our
sensibility, and concepts of physics such as causality or inertia are pure
intuitions of our faculty of understanding. In other words, the subject
experiences the real and the information received is processed, organized,
analyzed by reason. However, the reality is that a compound of phenomena,
behind which there are things in themselves (“noumena”). The phenomena is the
world as it appears on the noumena the world as it is, without a viewer.
After giving an explanation of how synthetic a priori knowledge makes
math and science possible, Kant turns to metaphysics. Metaphysics is the realm
of pure reason, ie the scope of a priori.
Kant, rationalism and
empiricism to criticism
In the Critique of Pure Reason, Kant achieves a synthesis between
rationalist and empiricist traditions. Rationalism, it takes up the idea that
pure reason is capable of important knowledge, and empiricism, he admits the
idea that knowledge comes primarily from the experience. Thus, it avoids the
metaphysical speculations of the rationalists without falling into metaphysical
skepticism.
Kant realizes what he calls a Copernican revolution in philosophy: that
is to overthrow the report subject / object, that is to ask that is the thought
that perceives the object. Kant denies the idea of making the mind a blank
page or a receiver of stimuli in the world. The mind does not only receive
information, it also provides information that shape. Knowledge, and is not
something that exists in the outside world and is then introduced into an open
mind. Knowledge is rather something created by the mind.
Kant differs from its predecessors by claiming that rationalists pure
reason can discern the shape, but not the content of reality. Rationalists such
as Descartes, Spinoza and Leibniz have speculated about the nature of time,
space, causality, God, thinking that pure reason was entitled to find
satisfactory answers to these objects.
The critique of pure reason opens a third way for metaphysics, half way
between rationalism that claims to know everything, and empiricism that defies
reason to be able to find anything out of the experience: this path is that of
criticism (or transcendental philosophy), which limits the power of reason to
re-legitimized.
No comments:
Post a Comment