Roger Bacon (1214/1220–1292), Master of Arts, contemporary of Robert
Kilwardby, Peter of Spain, and Albert the Great at the University of Paris in
the 1240s, was one of the early Masters who taught Aristotle's works on natural
philosophy and metaphysics. Sometime after 1248–49, he became an independent
scholar with an interest in languages and experimental-scientific concerns.
Between 1247 and 1267, Bacon mastered most of the Greek and Arabic texts on the
science of optics. In 1256/57, either at Paris or Oxford, he joined the
Franciscan Order. By 1264 in Paris, he came to believe that his university
reputation for advanced learning had suffered. Because he regarded this decade
as an exile from university teaching and writing, he sought the Patronage of
Cardinal Guy le Gros de Foulque, Papal Ambassador to England (who later served
as Pope Clement IV, 1265-68). On the instruction of the Pope on June 22, 1266,
Bacon quickly wrote “an introductory work,” the Opus maius, and the related
works, Opus minus and Opus tertium. He set out his own new model for a reform
of the system of philosophical and theological studies, one that would
incorporate language studies and science studies, then unavailable at the
universities. In this project, he was partly successful. He wrote a new and
provocative text on semiotics, and influenced the addition of perspectiva to
mathematical studies (the Quadrivium) as a required university subject. He
succeeded in setting out a model of an experimental science on the basis of his
study of optics. The latter was used in his extension of experimental science
to include new medicines and the general health care of the body. He did this
in a new context: the application of linguistic and scientific knowledge for a
better understanding of Theology and in the service of the Res publica
Christiana. Heretofore, it appeared that Bacon was condemned by his own Order
in 1278 “on account of certain suspected novelties.” This may have been due to
his interests in astrology and alchemy. The historical accuracy of this
condemnation has been questioned by some Bacon scholars, and it is now seen by
some as a later retrojection. Bonaventure and John Pecham were among his first
readers. It is clear that with the possible exception of the uses or astrology
and alchemy, Bacon shared in Bonaventure's project seeking a “reduction” of the
sciences to theology. Bacon also found a sympathetic reader and interpreter in
the great secular scholar of the Sorbonne, Peter of Limoges (d. 1306). Through
the latter, Bacon may have influenced Raymond Lull. Sometime in the late 1270s
or early 1280s, Bacon returned to Oxford, where he completed his edition with
introduction and notes of the Secretum secretorum, a Latin translation of an
Arabic text on the education of the Prince, the Sirr-al-‘asrar, which he
believed to be a work by Aristotle written for Alexander the Great. This work
of advice to the Prince points to Bacon's close connections to the Papal Court
through Pope Clement IV, the French Court through Alphonse of Poitiers, and the
English Court. His contacts with the Papal Curia were mediated by William
Bonecor, Ambassador of King Henry III. Bacon died at Oxford c. 1292.
Life and Works
Bacon remarks in the Opus tertium [OQHI], written c. 1267 that he had
devoted forty years to study since he first learned the alphabetum and that no
other scholar had worked as much in the Arts and Sciences as he. Some scholars
use this text to argue that Bacon was writing about his elementary education
and therefore that was born c. 1220 [Crowley (1950), Easton (1952), Lindberg
(DMS, 1983)]; others hold that he was writing about his early university
education -- Alphabetum philosophiae is a term Bacon uses in the chapter from
which the following cited text is taken -- and thus that he was born c. 1214
[Little (RBE, 1914), Maloney (CSTM, 1988), Hackett (1984, 1992, 1997a, 2005),
Molland (2004)]. The text reads:
I have labored much in
sciences and languages, and I have up to now devoted forty years [to them]
after I first learned the alphabetum; and I was always studious. Apart from two
of these forty years I was always [engaged] in study [or at a place of study],
and I had many expenses just as others commonly have. Nevertheless, provided I
had first composed a compendium, I am certain that within quarter or half a
year I could directly teach a solicitous and confident person whatever I know
of these sciences and languages. And it is known that no one worked in so many
sciences and languages as I did, nor so much as I did. Indeed, when I was
living in the other state of life [as an Arts Master], people marveled that I
survived the abundance of my work. And still, I was just as involved in studies
afterwards, as I had been before. But I did not work all that much, since in
the pursuit of Wisdom this was not required. ([OQHI], 65)
It would seem, then, that prior to his entry to the Franciscan Order, c.
1256-57, he was very active in his studies or at a studium or school, and that
he was known for his proficiency in sciences and languages. And yet, he himself
tells us that around 1248 or perhaps a little later, he set aside the common
scholastic ways of teaching in order to devote time to languages and
experimental concerns. (We are dealing with Bacon's vague recollections from c.
1268; it could well be that in 1250–51 he was still in Paris. He was certainly
there in 1251.) Thus, we can see the period from c. 1240–48 as the time during
which he lectured at Paris on Aristotle, on Grammar/Logic, and especially on
the mathematical subjects of the Quadrivium. And so, depending on the chosen
year of birth, the chronology would be as follows: (1) Bacon was born c. 1214,
educated at Oxford c. 1228–36, Master of Arts at Paris c. 1237–47/8, Private
Scholar 1248–56/7, active again at Oxford c. 1248–51, back in Paris 1251,
Franciscan Friar at Paris c. 1256-57 to 1279, returning to Oxford c. 1280, died
c. 1292. Or: (2) Bacon was born c. 1220, educated at Oxford c. 1234–42; Master
of Arts at Paris c. 1242–47/8, active again at Oxford c. 1248–51, back in Paris
1251, Franciscan Friar at Paris 1256/7 to 1279, returning to Oxford c. 1280, died
c. 1292. Further precision on the chronology must await the critical edition of
all the works of Roger Bacon and careful scientific study of these works in
relation to other thirteenth century scholars.
The Aristotelian Quaestiones are to be found in a single manuscript,
Amiens MS Bibl. Mun. 406. The materials found in this manuscript include two
sets of questions on the Physics and two sets of questions on the Metaphysics
of Aristotle, the questions on the Liber de causis, and the Pseudo-Aristotelian
De vegetabilibus. A new version of Bacon's second set of questions on the
Physics inter-textually excerpted by another thirteenth-century author has
recently been identified by Silvia Donati in Philadelphia MS Free Library,
Lewis Europe, ff. 77ra-85rb [Donati, in Hackett, 1997b]. This is an important
discovery that has enabled scholars for the first time to carry out a
critical-textual study of Bacon's works on Aristotle's Physics in the context
of the development of English natural philosophy in the period 1240–1300.
The early logical works consist of the Summa grammatica, Summa de
sophismatibus et distinctionibus and the Summulae dialectices [=Summulae super
totam logicam]. These works show that Bacon is indebted to the teaching of
logic at Oxford and Paris in the 1230s and 1240s. They have received much
critical study in recent years. They reveal Bacon as a mature philosopher of
logic who is representative of terminist and pre-modist grammar and logic.
Bacon's writings on grammar and logic have a connection with the Oxford Logica
cum sit nostra and with the works of William of Sherwood. The logical works are
clearly influenced by the teaching in Paris of Robert Kilwardby. They give
evidence of Bacon as a philosopher who connects the Logica modernorum with new
logical and philosophical problems based on the natural philosophy and
metaphysics of Aristotle as commented on by Avicenna and Averroes.
Alain de Libera has argued that the Summulae dialectices is typical of
mature works in the philosophy of logic c. 1250 and a little later. Scholars
have long held that Roger Bacon was a pioneer in the introduction of the study
of Aristotle as interpreted by Averroes and Avicenna to the University of Paris
c. 1240. During the past ten years or so, research has shown that two Erfurt
manuscripts (Amplon. Q. 290 and Q. 312) ascribed to Walter Burley (1274/5–1344)
by the Amplonius de Berka in the fifteenth century, actually belong to the
first half of the thirteenth century. Rega Wood, the editor of the Physics from
the Erfurt MS Amplon. Q 290, has attributed these questions on the Physics and
most of the other works in these two Erfurt manuscripts to Richard Rufus of
Cornwall, a contemporary and opponent of Roger Bacon [Wood in Hackett 1997b;
Wood, IPA, 2003].
Recently, it has also been demonstrated that as Master of Arts at Paris
during the period of the First Averroism (c. 1240-48), Bacon had confronted and
reviewed some of the major issues concerning the Latin Averroism which
eventually produced a major crisis at Paris in the period 1266–77.[2] And, as
we will see below, Bacon, in his works from the 1260s, will revisit these
topics. One can conclude that sometime in the late 1240s, Bacon ceased being a
Master of Arts at Paris, became an independent scholar, and returned to
England. Yet, there is evidence that he was back in Paris in 1251.
Bacon joined the Franciscan Order about 1256/7; whether he did so at
Oxford or Paris is not known. At any rate, he was probably in Paris in the late
1250s and was definitely there in the early 1260s. He had been attracted to the
Order by the philosophical, theological, and scientific example of Grosseteste,
Adam Marsh, and other English Franciscans. He had personally known Adam Marsh
at Oxford c. 1248-51. Because of their over-emphasis of a purported
condemnation of Bacon c. 1278, scholars had tended to ignore or tone down
Bacon's very real commitment to his Franciscan way of life. The past ten years
have seen new work by Amanda Power (2013) and Timothy J. Johnson (2009, 2010,
2013) placing significant emphasis on the compatibility of Bacon's concerns c.
1266 with the mission of the Franciscan Order as presented by Bonaventure and
the Franciscan School at Paris. By 1266, however, Bacon had come to regard the
previous ten years as one of enforced absence from scholarly work. He had done
little new intellectual work apart from some small pieces for his friends.
In answer to the Papal Mandate received in July 1266, Bacon produced
some very significant works. The Opus maius, Opus minus, and the related
foundational work in natural philosophy, De multiplicatione specierum, the work
on burning mirrors, De speculis comburentibus, together with an optical lens,
were sent to the Pope c. 1267-68. They were seen as a preamble to a proposed
major work on Philosophy. It remains a question as to whether the Opus tertium
was sent. Together with these works in the 1260s, Bacon produced the Preface to
the Works for the Pope, Communia naturalium, Communia mathematica, Epistola de
secretis operibus naturae et de nullitate magiae.
Amanda Power (2013) has provided a masterful interpretation of the new
context of Bacon's post-1266 works for Pope Clement IV. She places Bacon in a
Franciscan context within the wider mission of Christendom in its relations
with other cultures and religions. The Compendium studii philosophiae can be
dated to about 1271. This latter is a largely polemical work on the state of
studies at Paris and an apology for his scholarly situation. It does, however,
contain an important section on his theory of language and translation. He
completed the edition of the important work on medieval politics and
statecraft, the Secretum secretorum, at Oxford some time after 1280. It used to
be the view of scholars [Easton, 1952] that Bacon had composed this work in the
1240s and that it was the main influence in his search for a "universal
science". But even if Easton's position on the dating of the publication
of the Secretum secretorum does not hold, it is clear that by 1266 and later,
this work played a major role in Bacon's understanding of the political uses of
the experimental sciences. He also produced an important work on the calendar,
the Computus. The Compendium studii theologiae is usually dated c. 1292.
One must bear in mind that Roger Bacon in the 1260s is writing as an
individual author for a patron, Cardinal Guy le Gros de Foulque (Pope Clement
IV, 1265–68). A onetime Master of Arts, he was no longer a teaching Master at
the University of Paris. This gave Bacon the freedom to address both philosophical
(Aristotle) and theological (Augustine) issues in a manner denied to teachers
in the Faculty of Arts, who were limited for the most part to disputations on
the texts of Aristotle. He writes self-consciously as a representative of the
text-based practices of Robert Grosseteste and in opposition to the new
“sentence-methods” of the schools of theology. His polemical writings ca.
1267-68 are centered on the struggles in the Arts and Theology at Paris. The
Pope instructed Bacon in 1266 to ignore the rules of his Order and to send him
his remedies about matters of some importance. It would appear from the context
of Bacon's works for the Pope that the remedies had to do with educational
matters at Paris, which at this time was the foremost university of the
Christian commonwealth. The remedies sought must also have concerned
geo-political matters as well as the exigencies of Christian missions. Because
of this instruction, Bacon's later works, written in haste, consist of short
treatises united by a self-conscious rhetoric for the reformation of education
in the early universities of the Latin West. They are fundamentally important
for an understanding of the “struggle of the faculties” in the mid-thirteenth
century. The Compendium studii theologiae c. 1292 reflects the concerns of the
1260s. It does not add new information.
The reception of the life and works of Roger Bacon is complex. Each
generation has, as it were, found its own Roger Bacon. Another study by Amanda
Power (2006) has provided a thoughtful account of the complex reception of
Roger Bacon in England and of the extent to which the image of the Doctor
Mirabilis is often colored by the changing controversies of the present down
through history.
No comments:
Post a Comment