· Passages: Destroying Democracy ·
1304b: 20-1305a7: The main cause of the overthrow of democracies is the
outrageous behavior of demagogues. By attacking [rich] property owners they
motivate them to band together out of fear, and they also spur on the people
[to try to bleed the rich]. In this way democracy has been overthrown at
numerous places: Cos, Rhodes, Heracleia, Megara, Cyme. This is more or less the
way democracies are destroyed. To win popular support, demagogues propose
unjust treatment for the notables and thus force them to band together, by
making them give up their property for redivision, or by having them expend
their resources on public service, or by slandering them to force confiscations
of their property.
1311a: 22-26: The same beginnings lead to the overthrow of polities and
monarchies alike. For those who are ruled attack monarchies on account of
injustice, fear, and contempt
1301b: 26-29: Factional conflict (stasis) erupts everywhere on account
of inequality, or at least it does if no proportion exists between those who
are unequal. In general, people engage in factional conflict seeking equality.
1303b: 6-7: In democracies, the notables cause factional conflict
because they have [only] an equal share in things even though [in their own
eyes] they are not equal [to everybody else but feel superior and therefore
feel they should possess more political power, etc. than those whom they see as
their inferiors].
1302a: 31-34: Factional conflict is the result of fighting to gain
profit and honor and to avoid their opposites, dishonor and penalties.
1301b: 26-29: Factional conflict (stasis) erupts everywhere on account
of inequality, or at least it does if no proportion exists between those who
are unequal. In general, people engage in factional conflict seeking equality.
1303b: 6-7: In democracies, the notables cause factional conflict
because they have [only] an equal share in things even though [in their own
eyes] they are not equal [to everybody else but feel superior and therefore
feel they should possess more political power, etc. than those whom they see as
their inferiors].
1302a: 31-34: Factional conflict is the result of fighting to gain
profit and honor and to avoid their opposites, dishonor and penalties.
1302b: 21-24: Fear causes factional conflict, both when men fear
punishment for injustice they have committed and also when they fear being
treated unjustly. At Rhodes, for example, the notables rebelled against the
people on account of legal prosecutions that were being brought against them.
1302b: 27-33: Factional conflict occurs in democracies when the rich
feel contempt for the disorder and anarchy [of the government], as at Thebes
and Megara following defeats in battle and on Rhodes preceding the rebellion
[of the notables].
1302b: 15-18: Factional conflict can arise when there is a person or a
group whose power exceeds that of the city-state or its government. The
institution of ostracism came into being to prevent this.
1308b: 20-22: Since men’s private lives can lead them to seek the
overthrow of the system of government, a magistracy is needed to oversee those
living against the common advantage of the city-state, for example, in a
democracy those living lives disadvantageous for democracy.
1303b: 7-12: City-states sometimes fall into factions on account of
their topography. At Athens, for example, the citizens ones living in the
Piraeus [the harbor district] are more democratic than those in the urban
center.
1302a: 8-13: Democracy is more stable and less prone to factional
conflict than oligarchy. In an oligarchy there are two types of possible
conflict, namely, conflict between the oligarchs themselves and conflict
between the oligarchs and the people. In a democracy, however, there is only
conflict between citizens favoring democracy and citizens favoring oligarchy,
as no serious factional conflict arises in the people [that is, those favoring
democracy] against themselves.
No comments:
Post a Comment