Beyond Good and Evil is a comprehensive
overview of Nietzsche's mature philosophy. The book consists of 296 aphorisms,
ranging in length from a few sentences to a few pages. These aphorisms are
grouped thematically into nine different chapters and are bookended by a
preface and a poem. While each aphorism can stand on its own, there is also
something of a linear progression between aphorisms within chapters and from
one chapter to another. Nonetheless, each aphorism presents a distinctive point
of view, and even the individual chapter summaries omit a great deal.
The preface accuses philosophers of dogmatism,
and the first chapter explores this claim. Every great philosophy, Nietzsche
asserts, is little more than the personal confession. Philosophers build up
complex systems of thought to justify their own assumptions and prejudices. If
we can dig these out, we can see what these philosophers value most deeply, and
so gain insight into their character.
Nietzsche contrasts their dogmatism with the
"free spirit" that is not caught up in a particular point of view. He
hopes the philosophers of the future will be characterized by such an
experimental method, willing to try out any hypothesis, and follow any argument
all the way to its conclusion.
After a discussion of the religious spirit,
which he claims is a kind of dogmatism, Nietzsche embarks on a series of
epigrams, most of which highlight our bizarre psychological make-up. Next, he
looks at the long history of moral systems as a set of different attempts at
self- overcoming. He speaks out strongly against the morality of the
"herd" that encourages a dull mediocrity in all. He finds such a
mediocrity in modern scholarship, which is overly concerned with digging up
dry, dull facts. Nietzsche's ideal philosopher creates meaning and values, and
does not simply deal with empty facts.
Nietzsche asserts that there is an "order
of rank" according to which the spiritual strength of all people can be
measured. Because of this difference between people, it would be absurd to
apply one moral code to all people. Nietzsche suggests that the strongest
people are marked by a cruelty to themselves, according to which they
mercilessly expose their every prejudice and assumption in order to dig more
deeply into themselves. At bottom, however, everyone has prejudices. To prove
this point, Nietzsche launches an eight-page tirade against women.
Next, he addresses the question of
nationalities and nationalism, drawing on a kind of Lamarckism that sees
different nationalities or "races" as inherently having certain
characteristics. Among other things, Nietzsche attacks anti- Semitism,
criticizes the English, and advances the concept of the "good European,"
who rises above nationalist sentiment to find true individuality.
The final chapter presents Nietzsche's
conception of "what is noble": a solitary, suffering soul, who has
risen so far above the common rabble as to be unrecognizable and totally
misunderstood by them. He closes the book with a weak poem about such a noble
soul sitting on a mountaintop wishing he had more friends.
Overall Analysis and Themes
An understanding of Nietzsche's work as a whole
relies on a solid grasp of his views on truth and language, and his metaphysics
and conception of the will to power. At the very bottom of Nietzsche's
philosophy lies the conviction that the universe is in a constant state of
change, and his hatred and disparagement of almost any position can be traced
back to that position's temptation to look at the universe as fixed in one
place. Nietzsche is skeptical of both language and "truth" because
they are liable to adopt a fixed perspective toward things.
Words, unlike thoughts, are fixed. Our thoughts
can flow and change just as things in the universe flow and change, but a word,
once uttered, cannot be changed. Because language has this tendency toward
fixity, it expresses the world in terms of facts and things, which has led
philosophers to think of the world as fixed rather than fluid. A world of rigid
facts can be spoken about definitively, which is the source of our conception
of truth and other absolutes, such as God and morality.
Nietzsche sees the facts and things of
traditional philosophy as far from rigid, and subject to all sorts of shifts
and changes. He is particularly brilliant in analyzing morality, showing how
our concept of "good," for instance, has had opposite meanings at
different times. The underlying force driving all change is will, according to
Nietzsche. In specific, all drives boil down to a will to power, a drive for
freedom and domination over other things. The concept of "good" has
had different meanings over time because different wills have come to
appropriate the concept. Meaning and interpretation are merely signs that a
will is operating on a concept.
Because facts and things depend for their
meaning on ever-shifting and struggling wills, there is no such thing as one
correct or absolute viewpoint. Every viewpoint is the expression of some will
or other. Rather than try to talk about the "truth," we should try to
remain as flexible as possible, looking at matters from as many different
perspectives as possible. Nietzsche's ideal "philosophy of the
future" is one that is free enough to shift perspectives and overturn the
"truths" and other dogmas of rigid thinking. Such philosophy would
see moral concepts such as "good" and "evil" as merely
surfaces that have no inherent meaning; such philosophy would thus move "beyond
good and evil." Nietzsche's ideal philosophers would also turn their will
to power inward, struggling constantly against themselves to overcome their own
prejudices and assumptions.
Nietzsche's unorthodox views on truth can help
to explain his unusual style. Though we can follow trains of thought and make
connections along the way, there is no single, linear argument that runs
through the book. Because Nietzsche does not see the truth as a simple,
two-dimensional picture, he cannot represent it accurately with a simple linear
sketch. Nietzsche sees the world as complex and three-dimensional: more like a
hologram than a two-dimensional picture. And just as a hologram is a
three-dimensional image made up of infinitesimal two- dimensional fragments,
each approximating the whole, Nietzsche presents his worldview in a series of
two-dimensional aphorisms, each approximating a more complex worldview. Beyond
Good and Evil is Nietzsche's perspectivism in practice: we can read every
aphorism as one different perspective from which to look at Nietzsche's
philosophy. There is some sort of line we can trace, moving from perspective to
perspective, but essentially we end up with Nietzsche's philosophy in 9 big
pieces and 296 smaller fragments. In this way, Nietzsche attempts to find the
expression of his thoughts in language that best preserves their fluidity and
three-dimensionality.
No comments:
Post a Comment