Humanism by Heidegger
vs. Existentialism by Sartre
The “Letter on Humanism” Heidegger was published a year after the
conference “Existentialism is a Humanism” by Sartre pronounced at the Sorbonne.
This can be read as a response to existentialism is a humanism of Sartre.
Heidegger and
classical humanism
After the publication of Being and Time, Heidegger’s project is to
criticize classical humanism through Sartre, based on the metaphysics of the
subject. He will attempt to rethink, rebuild humanism from Being, and not
anymore from man.
The initial question is: How can we think of Being? According to
Heidegger’s philosophy, the question of being, not only being as being, but the
Being of beings, the nature of being as such, has not been properly thought.
Classical philosophy missed the ontological ground of being because it has not
sufficiently understood what is meant by “thinking.” For Heidegger “thinking”
(Denken) means something fundamentally different from our everyday
understanding of the term. Thinking for Heidegger is a type of action, but an
action that still surpasses all praxis. For Heidegger, thinking in the highest
sense is not reducible to techné: though, is waiting for “the advent of the Being, Being
as coming” The thought is a kind of intermediary between man and Being. In
other words, the question “What is thinking? “Is necessarily linked to the
question” What is Man? “.
Heidegger and The
Shepherd of Being
Being is given to man (the concept of “there”) and the man becomes “the
shepherd of Being.” What is the meaning of the destiny of man as eksistere. as
guardian of Being in which he lives? Heidegger will argue that the thought
itself is a form of action, “the mind is in that she thinks” This definition of
thought is opposed to a technical interpretation of thinking, oriented techne,
praxis The effectuation. This tradition dates back to Plato and Aristotle, for
whom thinking is to do. This is because Western philosophy would become a
science it has abandoned the essence of thought: thought is exploited.
In Heidegger, modernity is a state of homelessness, in which the man
lost his shelter, being, and thus becomes a stranger to his thought to himself.
The oblivion of Being must be replaced by a collection of Being.
Unlike animals or stones, man is the only being intended to suggest the
essence of his own being. The essence of the human being lies in his eksistence.
Animals and stones do not share this way of being with the man.
Heidegger’s humanism
summary
Humanism Heidegger appears as a shift of man and return to the thought
of Being, which is the true essence of man. Without Being, man is not a man
(homo), and not a human (Humanitas). But this critique of Western humanism is
of course not a defense of the inhuman, it is not an endorsement to barbarism
or to the brutality. Rather Heidegger seeks to correct a misinterpretation of
the concept of man.
The ontological analysis of Being as Dasein necessarily lead to a change
in the way we think the essence of being human. The “Letter on Humanism” does
not seek to abolish metaphysics, but to correct and complete the humanism of metaphysics
and humanism rebuilding.
Humanism for Heidegger becomes
meditation and attention of Being. In Sartre, humanism is the individual and
the basis of value. Humanism in Heidegger must exceed traditional metaphysics
out of the design technique of Being and man. Because in the end, Heidegger
criticizes classical humanism for not thinking high enough about man: man must be understood as Humanitas,
not a rational animal.
No comments:
Post a Comment